Platforms & issuers
Multi-program portfolios
Platforms, issuers, and program managers carrying stored value across dozens or hundreds of underlying programs, each with its own behavior.
What drives breakage here
The behavior specific to this program type
Program heterogeneity
Concentration risk
Contractual allocation
Onboarding cohorts
How we analyze it
Our approach for this structure
Every step is built from your own history and reconciled to your reported position.
- 01Normalize data across underlying programs into a common cohort structure.
- 02Cluster programs by observed redemption behavior rather than by merchant category alone.
- 03Model curves per cluster, holding out programs with insufficient history.
- 04Roll cluster results up to a portfolio position with concentration disclosure.
- 05Overlay contractual allocation to show the position by counterparty.
- 06Establish a repeatable reporting cadence as new programs mature.
Signals
When an audit is worth running
One rate for everything
A single breakage assumption is applied across a structurally diverse portfolio.
Counterparty disputes
Merchants or partners question how unredeemed value is measured and allocated.
Diligence or transaction
An investor or acquirer needs the stored-value liability independently quantified.
Engagement
Run your breakage audit
A confidential, analyst-led review of your stored-value liability — expected breakage, redemption behavior, and escheatment exposure quantified against your own data.
No engagement commitment required. Scope is confirmed before work begins.