Prepaid & stored value
Open-loop and reloadable prepaid products
Products where dormancy, fee mechanics, and regulatory treatment interact — and where residual balances are the most misunderstood part of the liability.
What drives breakage here
The behavior specific to this program type
Dormancy dynamics
Fee interaction
Reload behavior
Regulatory sensitivity
How we analyze it
Our approach for this structure
Every step is built from your own history and reconciled to your reported position.
- 01Reconstruct funding and spend events per account, treating each load as a distinct cohort.
- 02Separate customer-driven redemption from fee-driven balance reduction.
- 03Define behavioral dormancy thresholds from observed inactivity distributions rather than policy defaults.
- 04Model terminal residual balances by product tier and load size.
- 05Quantify the inactive share of outstanding value and its aging profile.
- 06Map dormant balances against jurisdictional dormancy characteristics for exposure assessment.
Signals
When an audit is worth running
Long inactive tail
A large count of low-balance accounts with no activity for multiple years.
Fee policy change
Inactivity or maintenance mechanics changed and the liability model was never updated.
Unclaimed-property review
You need a quantified view of dormant value before a compliance assessment.
Engagement
Run your breakage audit
A confidential, analyst-led review of your stored-value liability — expected breakage, redemption behavior, and escheatment exposure quantified against your own data.
No engagement commitment required. Scope is confirmed before work begins.